Initial thoughts on Ofsted’s summary evaluations of academy trusts

The last few weeks have seen Ofsted publish an initial batch of ‘summary evaluations’ of multi-academy trusts. These reports are the first published under its new approach to reviewing academy trusts, as outlined here: Overview of Ofsted’s approach to ‘summary evaluations’ of MATs.

Whilst it is early days, we have been watching with interest which aspects of trusts’ work Ofsted has chosen to include in their summary evaluation reports, giving us an insight into what they consider to be key to effective MAT development and delivery. Our view at Forum Strategy is that the MAT model is based on autonomy and freedom to respond to context and the needs and aspirations of this generation of children and young people. We believe that principles rather than specific practices (unless these relate to compliance and regulatory issues) should define what we mean at a national level by effective MATs. We most certainly do not want to see Ofsted’s summary evaluations interpreted as ‘best practice’ guides, where MATs then respond in a knee-jerk way to what other trusts ‘hailed’ by the inspectorate are doing in their own specific contexts.

Featured

Related Posts

How Data Savvy is your Board?

How Data Savvy is your Board?

Patrick DunneForum Strategy AssociateIn a recent Linkedin Article, From a Maps to a SatNav world -The way Boards are taking decisions is changing, I shared the chart below and made a few comments on the characteristics of “Data Savvy” boards.  The chart and...

read more
Trust-wide CPD: creating coherence and impact

Trust-wide CPD: creating coherence and impact

By David WestonTeacher Development Trust One of the key benefits of being part of an academy trust is the ability to ensure teachers and leaders have high quality professional development, based on the very best thinking and drawing upon the expertise of the whole...

read more

Need Help?

Get In Touch

Follow Us